PLEASE NOTE: If you had an account with the previous forum, it has been ported to the new Genetry website!
You will need to reset the password to access the new forum. Click Log In → Forgot Password → enter your username or forum email address → click Email Reset Link.

Notifications
Clear all

Inverter reliability

53 Posts
10 Users
0 Likes
1,004 Views
(@notmario)
Reputable Member
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 314
 

FWIW, in the industrial world, we use active cooling so that equipment doesn't have to withstand such conditions.
More practical to control the environment than engineer devices for such an environment.

No need to over-complicate matters. 🙂


   
ReplyQuote
(@dickson)
Noble Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 1053
 

 "Oh, let's make a 12kw inverter, it's just double the size of a 6kw."  Whew, was that an understatement!  

You  are  not done yet as the  parts require  higher spec  and  difficult to get .   Making  any 12 kw inverter to run  continuously at 120 degree F  is not possible  with only  air cooling  as the parts  will require  military spec and  no way  to sell the GS 12 kw  for under 3000 dollars but more like  12000 dollars or more .   


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Something I found when dealing with blown horizontal output transistors in CRT display systems was the spike that occurs from the transistor switching off could anly be handled by adding a small cap across the primary coil to dull the spike, than a diode to shunt it

The FETs have the diodes in them but the cap catches the rising edge


   
ReplyQuote
(@sid-genetry-solar)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2886
 
Posted by: @steve
Something I found when dealing with blown horizontal output transistors in CRT display systems was the spike that occurs from the transistor switching off could anly be handled by adding a small cap across the primary coil to dull the spike, than a diode to shunt it

My guess here is that the slew rate of the spike was too fast for the diode.  Diodes have a switching delay--and during that time a spike will not be "clamped."  If the slew rate is fast enough, it can reach a damaging level BEFORE the diode clamps it.  I haven't been able to find clear "forward switching delay" specs (or many specs at all!) for a 1N4007, but I am aware of the "reverse recovery time" specification.  (Assuming that the switching time will be similar??)

For example, it appears that the "reverse recovery time" of a standard silicon 1N4007 is closer to 2uS--which when a slew rate is measured in v/ns (volts per nanosecond) that's an eternity!

High speed switching circuits generally utilize "ultra fast recovery" diodes, which can have a recovery time as low as ~35nS (= 0.035uS), depending on the voltage and specification.

...so this is where the capacitor comes in handy, sized to "snub" the spike from exceeding unsafe potentials until the diode can react.  At least that's my theory 😉.


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Your theory is correct

The diode switching delay allows un snubbed spikes from the coil

A cap across the coil has no switching delay allowing it to effectively snub the spike

When coil current is cut the coil dumps it's stored energy by running the voltage up and is pretty much instant

The size of the spike depends on how much power the coil was absorbing at the time

The spike should be considered as J not V as it's a set amount of energy but the voltage or current could be anything 


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

No load 0.22uf across primary

IMG_20220806_224302.thumb.jpg.ab6702b5e62afe323d86f2ad6d7b17a7.jpgno load no cap

IMG_20220806_224254.thumb.jpg.9b2e5d7da68b8ada10ac5fb0ef1ddecc.jpgshoplight no cap

IMG_20220806_224130.thumb.jpg.c48a9a9e4d25b8d461a63715ac6d88df.jpgshoplight with capIMG_20220806_224135.thumb.jpg.171c40721751625fa3879cb0fac97809.jpg


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Much cleaner sign wave with cap across primary and it should completely eliminate spike damaged FETs


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Running the shop light (E ballast) the input watts go up 2W 80W to 82W but running a small AC motor the input watts went down 2W 92W to 90W with .22uf across the primary wires on the transformer 


   
ReplyQuote
(@sid-genetry-solar)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2886
 

Pardon me, but I am failing to see any significant difference between the 2 pictures....

Worth noting that all of the MOS boards have a 0.1uF + 220R snubber circuit across them (C1 + R3).  That resistor gets pretty hot...needs to be physically bigger!

 

In theory, of course, the "perfect" place for a snubber cap would be after the ferrite chokes on the transformer primary...but I calculated a buck-converter equivalent of somewhere north of 100uF @ 50vAC (48v), a bit difficult 😉

 

Funny that we used to have a 20MHz GoldStar.  Biggest complaint with it was a bad connection in one of the front panel switches causing it to have a random left-direction offset, but other than that, it was pretty good.  (Add a rubber band between the offending knob and a different one to "hold the screen.")  Nowadays I've got what some people call a "Nintendoscope", a DSO (Siglent SDS1104X), and I have no regrets.  SO handy to be able to hit the "Stop" button and then examine what I'm looking at...


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Without the cap there is a knee in the wave shortly after the peak

It's much reduced by the cap

I'm suspecting the core temp on the transformer could be reduced at higher loads by smoothing out the chops from the wave slicer (less effective resistance without the chop frequency)

The snub cap needs to be very low resistance from the coil 

Having a resistor in line with the cap just let's the initial spike run up


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

You don't need the cap sized for 60Hz you need it for about 48Khz

Add a decay slope to the chop wave

You aren't using the transformer for the wave shaping only voltage shifting

So filter the wave before the transformer and you protect the FETs from spikes and the transformer from higher frequency heating 


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Just did some playing

0.22uf across the primary works well

Increasing it just increases idle

Removed 1 of the 4.7uf filter caps

Output noise didn't really change much

Tried adding the cap 4.7 back on to the other phase and current and noise went up not down

Now removing both caps and putting 1 smaller one line to line seems likely the best option 


   
ReplyQuote
(@steve)
Estimable Member
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 212
 

Pulled the filter caps and learned the regulation is unfiltered

Had a small toroid core around here someplace...need to add it to the wire from the transformer to the controller board so I can use smaller cap without making the regulation chatter 


   
ReplyQuote
(@sid-genetry-solar)
Member Admin
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 2886
 
Posted by: @steve
Pulled the filter caps and learned the regulation is unfiltered

It's a PJ...the regulation is ALWAYS oscillating.  But if it's going into an even bigger oscillation, that kinda tells you that the output AC wave isn't very clean.


   
ReplyQuote
(@aquaticslive)
Reputable Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 249
 
Posted by: @steve
Output noise didn't really change much

Something else you can try is grab a older AM radio and listen to the white noise, I can hear changes in the noise with different filtering that doesn't show up on the scope.  May not be your thing though but I like to listen the AM radio in the boonies so I have spent time to clean up the noise on my PJ.

 

 


   
ReplyQuote
Page 2 / 4